View Mobile Site

The labor battles in Michigan

Most popular today

Articles
Multimedia
Blogs
 
 
  • Bookmark and Share

Play some games on the Courier
Search for valuable coupons and print them out

Courier Friends to Follow

POSTED: December 25, 2012 12:00 p.m.

Michigan gave birth to the United Auto Workers. The union was founded at a convention in Detroit in 1935. After its famous sit-down strike in 1937 in Flint, Mich., the UAW won recognition by General Motors and, in the next several years, by Chrysler and Ford. It was the advent of an era of industrial unionization that may be coming to a symbolic end in the same place it started.

Michigan just passed the kind of “right to work” law that is anathema to unions everywhere and is associated with the red states of the Sun Belt, not the blue states of the Rust Belt. To say that such a development is stunning is almost an understatement. The union model hasn’t just been central to Michigan’s economy, but to its very identity.

At its inception, UAW officials got roughed up by company thugs at the famous “Battle of the Overpass,” when Ford still was resisting signing a contract with the union. Some 70 years later, the union movement is getting undone by simple economic realities.

The effect of right-to-work laws, which permit employees to work at unionized companies without joining the union and paying mandatory dues, is hard to pin down precisely because so many other factors affect a state’s economic condition. But Michigan began undergoing a real-world experiment after neighboring Indiana adopted a right-to-work law earlier this year, the first Rust Belt state to do so.

The early returns weren’t encouraging. The Mackinac Center, a free-market Michigan think tank, reports that Indiana added 43,300 jobs — 13,900 of them in manufacturing — while Michigan shed 7,300 jobs. Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder, a Republican reformer but not a bomb thrower, says seeing 90 companies from around the country decide to settle in Indiana after the labor change influenced his willingness to sign a bill doing the same thing.

Michigan already was losing out to right-to-work states before having one on its border. Shikha Dalmia of Reason magazine points out that, with the exception of a brief foray by Mazda, no foreign automaker has set up shop in Michigan, despite the state’s pool of experienced autoworkers. It is hard to be a manufacturing state specializing in autos if you can’t attract new automakers.

Election Day in Michigan brought a stark illustration of the declining political power of unions when they failed to pass an amendment to the state’s constitution banning right-to-work. More Michiganders voted “no” on the amendment, the Mackinac Center notes, than voted for President Obama. The failure emboldened the Republican-held legislature to push a right-to-work measure.

The unions so fear right-to-work laws because mandatory dues are such a boon to them. There’s nothing like forcing people to belong to your organization to boost the membership rolls and the treasury. In one month in 2011 after Gov. Scott Walker ended mandatory dues for public-sector unions in Wisconsin, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees shed half its members, according to The Wall Street Journal.

So many decades after they, in effect, won the Battle of the Overpass, the unions have lost the Battle of Lansing.

Lowry is editor of the National Review.

 

What others say about this article

  • Bookmark and Share

Commenting not available.
Commenting is not available.

 

Featured Video


Please wait ...