By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
U.S. high school graduation rates are up, but significant ethnic and socioeconomic gaps remain
dc387e32550bcef0913932811b89d3efde739788f3a605ae57941eeefd7a4f7f
High school graduation rates are up, but is that the system is being rigged or real progress on the ground? - photo by Eric Schulzke
This spring saw some rare good news on the U.S. education scene when the federal government announced high school graduation rates jumped to 81 percent in 2012, up from 73 percent in 2006.

"America's students have achieved another record-setting milestone," U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said in a statement. "Our high school graduation rate is now at an all-time high," tweeted President Barack Obama.

High school graduation is vital marker, experts agree. Research has repeatedly found graduation has sweeping implications for lifetime earnings, health, addictions, criminal behavior and dependency on government support. A significant upturn in graduation rates would have huge social implications.

But are these touted gains real?

A real shift

One indication graduation gains are real, said Richard Murnane, an education economist at Harvard, is the eighth-grade scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress tests, which he says have substantially improved since 1995, especially for African-Americans and Latinos.

Those eighth-grade test scores have long been one of the best predictors of high school graduation, so improvement there says something: "The NAEP scores do tell us that something real is happening," Murnane said.

Murnane authored a 2013 journal article unpacking graduation rate trends, finding the improvements are real but that there is not enough data to say what factors are to thank.

"The evidence on high school reforms that are effective in increasing graduation rates for economically disadvantaged students is much too thin to provide anything like a set of blueprints for improving secondary school education," he wrote.

Murnane points to some outside factors he thinks pushed graduation rates up, aside from anything that might have been done in schools. First, there as a sharp decline in teen pregnancy, and second, a drop youth criminality that began in 1995. Both of these allowed more children to stay in school. He also points to increased spending on pre-K programs, which, he says, have outsized effects down the road.

Chicago blues

Not everyone agrees these improvements should be taken at face value. A recent high-profile series by National Public Radio and 14 of its member stations says the new graduation rate numbers "should be taken with a big grain of salt."

NPR identified three pathways to higher graduation rates: "(1) Stepping in early to keep kids on track; (2) Lowering the bar by offering alternate and easier routes when students falter; and (3) Gaming the system by moving likely dropouts off the books, transferring or misclassifying them."

While the series did address some success stories, it also clearly suggested that in some cities, including Chicago, bookkeeping games have masked the fact that little real progress has been made.

This struck a nerve for Elaine Allensworth, managing director of the University of Chicago's Urban Education Institute. She argues the report downplayed real gains shown by Chicago's early intervention strategies.

Instead of focusing on what is working in Chicago, Allensworth said, NPR focused on ambiguous details. NPR reporters noted that some students at risk of not graduating were falsely listed as having moved or switched to home school. But even taken at face value, Allensworth counters, those errors would have little impact on the whole. And, she adds, whatever impact they do have is more than balanced by quirks in the bookkeeping system resulting in many students who actually have moved being wrongly listed as dropouts.

"Even if you counted all transfer students as nongraduates," Allensworth said, "the trends are still up."

"NPR could have focused on programs that have been incredibly effective and changed thousands of lives," Allensworth said. "Instead, they cast doubt on all the progress by focusing on obscure data and coding questions."

NPR did, however, at least briefly cite Allensworth's influential work in the role of "on-track" monitoring, that allows schools to track children from eighth grade or even earlier, arranging interventions for those showing early crisis signs. These interventions, Allensworth argues, more than anything, are producing results in Chicago.

New challenges

Data on high school graduation rates has improved in recent years, said John Q. Easton. Now a senior fellow at the Chicago-based Spencer Foundation, Easton spent five years as the director of the Institute of Education Sciences for the U.S. Department of Education in the Obama administration.

Much of this data improvement is due to federal pressure on states and localities to use the standardized measures and use them more consistently. Previously, data was collected haphazardly. Starting with the 2010-11 school year, the new Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate came on-line for the first time.

But with the improvement of data, Easton notes, new challenges arise. Today, as the need for postsecondary education rapidly becomes a requirement, not an option. A high school diploma is less of an economic boost today than it was in the past.

"Today, people recognize that a high school degree is necessary but not sufficient," Easton said. Now we need better data on the transitions from high school to the next level, and not just high school alone, he said.

"The life outcomes are what we really want to know," Easton said. "We want to know whether these kids get jobs, lead stable lives, avoid risky behaviors and have good health. But we do know that high school graduation is a good predictor for these outcomes."
Sign up for our e-newsletters
New Medicare cards are in the mail and scammers are on the prowl
15a28f62e4e53fcceb32746533cbdfdf48abb7c7d42a28dbb1aeb1083721f23b
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has begun mailing new Medicare Health Insurance ID cards. The program no longer uses Social Security numbers to identify people. - photo by Lois M Collins
The federal government is beginning to send out new ID cards to the 58 million Americans who benefit from Medicare. But since many of the people who will receive them don't know they're coming or why, scammers are already gearing up to take advantage.

An AARP survey shows as many as three-fourths of Americans 65 and older have no idea the cards are coming, so some individuals may be duped with claims that they're supposed to pay a fee or provide personal information that will be used, instead, to defraud them.

The new cards are the first reissue in years, and the most striking part of the redesign is that the cards no longer carry the beneficiary's Social Security number. Congress mandated the removal of that number as an identifier for Medicare beneficiaries by next April. Instead, the card has a Medicare Beneficiary Identifier number, an 11-digit combination of numbers and letters.

The new Medicare cards are now being mailed out in batches, starting with the Eastern seaboard and moving west. Most Medicare beneficiaries will receive their cards over the next six months, as long as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has their correct mailing address. Once the cards are in hand, people can share the new identification number with their health care providers. During a transition period, either card is valid.

The old cards, which used Social Security numbers as the personal identification number, should be destroyed.

AARP recently launched an education campaign to warn consumers about scams related to the new Medicare cards.

The membership organization's "Fraud Watch" consultant, Frank Abagnale reformed con man, scammer and the subject of the movie and book "Catch Me If You Can" tells senior citizens the only time they need to carry the actual Medicare card is to health care appointments. Otherwise, it should be left in a safe place. If they want to carry one in their wallet or purse, he says, make a copy and black out the first seven numbers.

Since the cards were announced, scammers have already:

  • Called seniors and asked for their bank account information so that money on their old card could be returned. There is no money on the old card and CMS never asks for personal information over the phone.
  • Offered to send the new card after Medicare beneficiaries pay a $25 fee to cover expenses related to the card. The card is free.
  • Said the card will be mailed out as soon as the older person verifies his or her Social Security number, mailing address and other personal information. CMS already knows the beneficiary's Social Security number and it's no longer being used in conjunction with health care.
AARP and the Federal Trade Commission will hold a free online seminar about the cards and the fraud attempts they have spawned on Thursday, April 19, at 7 p.m. EDT. Register at: www.aarp.org/FraudWebinar. CMS also offers a "frequently asked questions" guide to the new cards.

The AARP Fraud Watch Network says consumers can sign up for its Watchdog Alert emails that deliver breaking scam information, or call a free helpline at 877-908-3360 to speak with volunteers trained in fraud counseling. Abagnale also hosts a weekly podcast for AARP, called The Perfect Scam.
Latest Obituaries