By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Don't battle over Civil War tourism
Placeholder Image
The 150th anniversary of the Civil War begins in 2011, and already there has been criticism by some that Georgia is “a day late and a dollar short” when it comes to promoting it. The fact is, in the midst of a fiscal crisis, the state is making wise and timely use of limited funding to develop a unique CW150 program that will draw visitors from around the world to Georgia.
Leading the charge is the Georgia Department of Economic Development, which has partnered with private organizations to create multiple interactive ways for people to explore Georgia’s Civil War history. Here at the Georgia Historical Society, we have collaborated with the GDEcD to survey and refurbish Civil War historical markers around the state as well as create and install new markers telling previously untold stories from the war about the role of women, African Americans, the home front, Unionists, industry, and politics. Historical marker dedications involving local communities and statewide dignitaries are taking place throughout 2010 and 2011, including an event today in Dalton featuring keynote speaker Andrew Young. These dedications are generating widespread interest on the local level in promoting the commemoration.
This partnership has also made possible the Civil War 150 Historical Marker Project micro website at georgiahistory.com, which allows visitors to use Google maps to plan and implement custom driving tours based on their personal interests. A mobile phone application for the GHS historical marker program is also in the works. With a relatively small investment, such innovations will promote heritage tourism to cities and small towns throughout the state. And rather than concentrate solely on the military aspect of the war as the Centennial did 50 years ago, we’ve been able to present an expanded, more inclusive view of Civil War that makes the conflict meaningful to all Georgians.
In addition to the GHS marker project, the state is preparing to launch GaCivilWar.org to help communities and organizations promote their CW150 activities across the state and beyond.
In collaboration with the Georgia Civil War Commission, the University of Georgia Press, and the Georgia Humanities Council, a new edition of Barry Brown and Rich Elwell’s “Crossroads of Conflict: A Guide to Civil War Sites in Georgia” has been commissioned. It’s chock full of color photos and expanded historical information.
Through these private-public partnerships we are offering local and out-of-state visitors a thorough, accessible Civil War experience that includes battlefields, historical markers, historic sites, and museums. By collaborating to promote each others’ activities, we’re making good use of the funding available as well as helping foster heritage tourism and build the economy of Georgia.
Georgia is already reaching history enthusiasts and potential visitors worldwide through its up-to-the-minute technology. People making travel plans over the next few years will find that Georgia is ready to share its rich history of the Civil War.

Groce is the President and CEO of the Georgia Historical Society. He can be reached at WTGroce@georgiahistory.com.
Sign up for our e-newsletters
Midway city councilman responds to previous letters to the editor
By Curtes Roberts
Placeholder Image

Editor,

This is in response to two letters to the editor published in the May 19 edition of the Coastal Courier. First, I should clear up the spelling of my name. It is Curtes, not Curtis.

The letter by Len Calderone stated that I stood outside the May 13 Midway City Council meeting and peered in through a window. This is a lie. I left the room and proceeded outside. When I returned, I stood at the back of the room near the door, where an employee was seated.
Len Calderone was seated in the front row, facing forward. I had a full view of him. He should know that I never have — and never will — peer in a window or door.

To both Len Calderone and Councilman Terrence Doyle, I comprehend “Robert’s Rules of Order” very clearly concerning the reading of minutes. However, the issue is not with “Robert’s Rules of Order,” but rather with Councilman Doyle’s insistence that the minutes be read. This is a no-brainer. We receive the meeting summary a couple of days following the meeting, and weeks later, we receive the minutes in time to study and make corrections if needed. If a member can’t read the minutes in three days, it is possible to assume that the member may have a reading or comprehension problem.

During the meeting, I intended to move to approve the minutes with corrections or as printed, whichever would have been applicable. Councilman Doyle wanted the minutes read because he wants his opinions omitted from the Nov. 15, 2012 minutes to be included.

“Robert’s Rules of Order” clearly states that the minutes should contain mainly a record of what was done at the meeting and not what was said by the members. If, according to you, the minutes are required to be read, then why was it not consistently done during the past three years? When minutes are not received in a timely manner, you are the first to comment.

What is the purpose of sending the minutes out in advance if they are going to be read? It is understood that a member may call for the reading, but your motives are not for the good of the council. If the business of the council is to take place, it’s all up to you.

Len Calderone needs to know that these positions are designated as part-time. However, I do not treat the job as part-time like some other council members who simply come to city hall to pay their water bills, check their mailboxes or collect their checks. They are the ones who should be asked to return their checks and resign.

Len Calderone has no concept of the hours I devote, day and night, to attending to city business and representing the city at various community events. Resign? Return a check? How dare you!

Latest Obituaries