By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Accusatory 'Beatriz at Dinner' leaves subtlety on the table
David Warshofsky, Salma Hayek, Jay Duplass and Connie Britton in Beatriz at Dinner. - photo by Josh Terry
BEATRIZ AT DINNER 2 stars Salma Hayek, John Lithgow, Connie Britton, Chloe Sevigny, David Warshofsky; R (language and a scene of violence); Broadway

Beatriz at Dinner is a bizarre, finger-pointing, us versus them kind of movie. Its battle lines are clear, even if its ultimate message isnt.

Beatriz (Salma Hayek) is a humble Southern California massage therapist and animal lover who is raising a small (probably illegal) zoo in her apartment. Shes in mourning over the recent loss of her favorite goat, which she believes was killed by an angry neighbor.

Beatrizs favorite client is Cathy (Connie Britton), a woman wealthy enough to live in a prestigious gated community in a house big enough to feature a full staff of live-in servants. Years earlier, Beatriz helped Cathys teenage daughter through a bout with cancer and has blurred the line between service provider and family friend ever since. So when, after her client-friends regular massage, Beatriz finds that her beater VW wont start, Cathy insists that she stay for dinner.

Dinner is actually a celebratory dinner party. Cathys husband Grant (David Warshofsky) is marking a significant development deal with Doug Strutt (John Lithgow), who runs a major corporation called Rife Worldwide. When asked if he builds hotels, Strutt smugly responds that he just owns them. Strutt is a cartoon caricature of a capitalist: arrogant, wealthy, corrupt and quick to share any politically incorrect observation that mechanically springs to his mind.

If you sense an allusion to our current president, you wont be the first.

Strutt and his wife Jeana (Amy Landecker) arrive on the heels of Cathys other guests, Shannon (Chlo Sevigny) and Alex (Jay Duplass), an insufferable pair of social climbers hoping their involvement in the deal will be the key to future boundless riches. Its about the worst possible combination for poor Beatriz, and as she lingers awkwardly around the perimeter of the conversation, Strutt mistakes her for one of the servants.

As we watch the evening unfold through Beatrizs eyes, the wealthy elite skip from one topic to the next, always touching on some sort of offensive element of their exclusive lifestyle. For her part, Beatriz always manages to say or do the most awkward thing possible, until eventually settling for confrontational soapbox tirades, usually directed at Strutt. About midway through the evening, Beatriz also begins insisting that she recognizes Strutt, and it becomes clear that their distant connection will only take the evening from bad to worse.

Director Miguel Arteta and writer Mike White clearly want us to side with Beatriz against Strutts two-dimensional real estate tycoon, and Lithgows bad guy turn is so on point its hard not to. But the most sympathetic characters in Beatriz at Dinner are the unfortunate hosts. Its easy to feel for nave Cathy, who was just trying to help a woman she feels is a friend. And then, to Grants horror, that friend winds up throwing a cellphone at his guest of honor.

The fact that Beatriz feels equally to blame for the evenings awkwardness makes Beatriz at Dinner much more watchable, but its transparent mission might have benefitted from a little more subtlety, and an ambiguous ending will leave you wondering just what Arteta and White intend you to take from all the festivities, especially in light of todays heated political climate.

The characters in Beatriz at Dinner feel so two-dimensional as to feel symbolic, but even if you dont buy what Arteta is selling, his film will still feel painfully relatable to anyone who ever had to show up at a party where they knew they didnt belong.

Beatriz at Dinner is rated R for language and a scene of violence; running time: 83 minutes.
Sign up for our e-newsletters